Is FanFight Safe and Legitimate? A 2026 Safety and Legitimacy Review

The most important safety signal for FanFight is its association with Head Digital Works, the company behind the A23 brand — one of India's oldest and largest online gaming operators with 19+ years of continuous operation since launching Ace2Three rummy in 2008. Head Digital Works reports 80 million+ registered users across its portfolio, which includes online rummy, poker, and cricket.com in addition to the fantasy sports vertical that FanFight occupied. The company's financial scale — with subsidiary revenue of ₹881.7 crore reported for FY24 — indicates institutional staying power that most independent fantasy sports platforms could not match. Head Digital Works has been one of the most active litigants in Indian gaming law, consistently arguing for the legal protection of skill-based games before High Courts and the Supreme Court. This legal track record — even in the context of an ongoing challenge to the 2025 Act — signals a company that takes its regulatory position seriously and has the resources to defend it. For FanFight users, the implicit safety guarantee of A23's parent company backing is meaningful, even if the FanFight brand itself has been retired.

The fact that FanFight was absorbed into the A23 Games platform — rather than shut down or sold off — is a positive data point for users evaluating the platform's corporate responsibility. In the merger communication sent to registered users, FanFight explicitly guaranteed that all account balances, winnings, and historical data would be transferred to the A23 platform without any loss to users. This was not guaranteed by every consolidation in the Indian fantasy sports sector — some platforms simply shut down and left user balances inaccessible. The automatic transfer of FanFight balances to A23 suggests that Head Digital Works treated the acquisition as a genuine product integration rather than an asset extraction. Users who had funds in their FanFight accounts at the time of the merger would have found those balances accessible on A23. This track record of user fund protection during a corporate transition is a meaningful indicator of how Head Digital Works handles its obligations to its user base — and is directly relevant for users evaluating whether to trust A23 with any new activity.

During its active period, FanFight publicly stated that it used 256-bit SSL encryption for all financial transactions — a standard baseline for financial data security that indicates the platform took transaction safety seriously. The mandatory KYC requirement — PAN card and linked bank account verification — for any user attempting a withdrawal added a layer of identity verification that is consistent with what regulated Indian financial platforms require. Each withdrawal on FanFight was processed to a verified bank account in the user's own name, making it structurally difficult for bad actors to use the platform as a money laundering conduit. The cricket.com integration for player statistics provided data integrity for the fantasy sports product itself, as the statistics source was a dedicated sports media platform rather than self-reported data. Following the merger into A23, these security practices would be governed by A23's security infrastructure, which benefits from the broader resources of the parent company. Users with concerns about the security of their legacy A23 accounts should enable two-factor authentication if available and monitor account activity regularly.

The most significant risk factor for FanFight users with remaining A23 account balances is the ongoing regulatory uncertainty created by India's Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025. Head Digital Works has challenged the Act's constitutionality before the Supreme Court, arguing that it violates fundamental rights by imposing a blanket ban on all online real-money games including games of skill like rummy, poker, and fantasy sports — categories that Indian courts have historically protected. The Supreme Court is currently hearing the consolidated petitions, with multiple hearings having occurred in late 2025 and early 2026. The outcome of this case could range from the Act being struck down entirely (restoring the pre-2025 regulatory environment), being partially modified to exempt games of skill, or being upheld in full (maintaining the current ban). Each outcome would have different implications for users with legacy balances on A23 and for anyone considering any future real-money gaming activity in India. Users should monitor developments in this case — through legal news sources or A23's official communications — and make informed decisions about whether to maintain balances on the platform or seek withdrawal while withdrawal remains available.